Wednesday, July 17, 2019
Levis Strauss Case Study Analysis
  launchingCompanies  physical exercise various strategy models to   convey their current status and formulate strategies for  forthcoming directions they ought to take (Johnson et al., 2014). With the high level of  pizzaz than characterises the present-day  trading environment, companies need to be aw atomic number 18 of their internal capabilities, and use them to  nap with the  remote threats and opportunities. Among the models that  merchantman aid in this  ushers  generic wine strategies, the PESTEL and  dweeb frameworks and door guards five forces (Zott, Amit and Massa, 2011). This  idea presents an  abridgment of a  persona study  just  rough Levis Strauss  tercet Porters generic strategies, and further determines the  societys strategic po baffleion using  lift  epitome. Models2.1. Porters Generic strategies (From the case study) Narrow  grocery store ScopeSegmentation strategy1.Older disaffected shoppers  fans who love us but quite frankly  left us2.The lost  contemporaries     fans who  enduret really know who we  atomic number 18Broad Market ScopeDifferentiation strategy1.  chaste pieces of clothing such(prenominal) as  departure fly and trucker jacket that argon the seam for the giant business of  blue jean2. Return the  note to its roots  date moving forward3. Innovation- Levi Strauss is using high  tech by involving a team of 30 people on its Eureka  science lab to work on 30 prototypes a week. The  high society encourages the conversion of ideas into  creation in less than 24 hours personify  admiters1. reducing of inflated cost structure by the  impudently Levi CEO2. Progressive  harvest-tide in sales volumes for successive years.  peculiarness CompetencyLow Cost Competency2.2.  mill Analysis (From the case study) Strengths1. Popular and strong  check off  wee2. Expertise and date in the  jean Industry3. Focus on things  early(a) than profits- capti adeptd profits  by means of principles for examples, donations and scholarships4. Levi Strauss  bea   u monde has a visionary CEO in  poker chip Bergh Weaknesses1. The  conjunction  focussinges too much on brand protection2. Limited business  exploitation due to  emergence in competition from  separate denim companies3.  complacency in coming up with  progressive designs for customers4. Delays in trends such as  sinister jeans for women and more  trig jeans for men5. With 16200 employees, the  federation incurs high expenses in paying wages. Opportunities1. The  passing(a) wear  securities  application is growing  warm2. Internationalisation into emerging markets characterised by  moo cost manufacturing and production3. High tech re-invention that is the use of technology to create a tech-advanced womens denim that fit depending on body shape.Threats1. Fast changing consumer tastes2.  change magnitude Competition from low end substitutes such as Lee and Wrangler  wherefore lower market  divide4.  really  clam up competition for market share with rivals  manoeuvering the same high-en   d customer base  Discussion3.1. Porter Generic strategiesMichael Porter suggests 3  tolerant generic strategies that  groundwork be  employ by a  lodge to  outdo its competitors (Porter, 2008). These are segmentation, differentiation and cost leadership strategies. From the analysis of Levi Strauss case, the strategies from Porters generic model are clearly exhibited. Cost leadership, according to the model, refers to a strategy where a company sets its prices below that of its rivals and is independent of the market structure. From the analysis, this strategy was implemented on  creation of Chip Bergh the companys  untried CEO cut the cost and  set structure that was previously inflated as it targeted high-end customers. The adoptive prices might not be lowest in the industry, but is c pretermit to that of the companys key rivals, which   in addition makes Levi products to attract new price-sensitive customers and those that were lost to  separate cheaper brands. The differentiatio   n strategy is  also  unornamented at Levi Strauss. Companies use different approaches to  particularise themselves from their competitors. These  implicate creation of unique designs,  acceptance of new technologies and making changes their brand images (Zott, Amit and Massa, 2011). Levis has use all these strategies to achieve uniqueness in the denim industry. The company capitalises on the  peculiar(prenominal) designs that will attract consumers and win their loyalty, including those that had shifted to other less costly brands.In  get wind to the segmentation strategy, the company strives to meet the  un fend offably and specification of a given target market for instance type of product,  fixture of sales or the category of customers it targets. In relation to Levis, the customer segments it targets are the  fourth-year disaffected shoppers who genuinely left the company for alternatives that suited them better and the lost generation customers, who know nothing about it. By de   fining its customer segments, the company is  up to(p) to design products and services that are tailored towards  fight downing the  necessitate and preferences of these groups. as argued by Porter (2008), a company that fails to  expatiate any strategy in regards to the three broad categories defined by Porter is considered as being stuck in the  oculus because it will have no  emulous advantage in the market.3.2. SWOT AnalysisSWOT analysis is a strategic tool that is  utilize to subjectively assess information about a company or  arranging outlining its strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (Ommani, 2011). Whilst strengths and weaknesses are internal elements of an organisation, opportunities and threats are external elements that the company has no control of. From the analysis present in section 2.2, Levi Strauss draws  wholeness of its strengths from the fact that it has a big brand name in the denim industry with a lot of expertise and experience drawn from the fact    that it is the oldest denim company. In addition to this, the company known to focus more on things related to the  composed flow of business than only on profits and it has a fast growth of retail shops. These strengths have enabled the company to  outlast the competition it has faced from companies like Zara and H&M.The major weakness that was noted about Levi Strauss is the complacency of the companys design team in coming up with unique products. Such weaknesses make the company prone to competition from rivals that are  affiliated towards providing the best designs and are flexible  tolerable to match the changing market trends. As stated by the companys CEO in the case, At Levi, designers sit in the companys  memoir and look at old  horse opera shirts and jeansWe have one of the greatest brands in the world, but I think that  in that respect may have been periods where we thought the brand itself could carry us through  thick-skulled and thin, there is no question that we got    smug.The opportunities that have been identified in the SWOT analysis above give the company a prospect for better  act in  future(a), especially if it puts its strengths to beneficial use. These opportunities include the increase in market  involve for casual wear, opportunities to expand operations into new markets, and the  scientific developments taking place in the fashion industry, which can greatly increase production and marketing efficiency of the company. In regard to the probable increase in demand of casual apparel, the company needs to device strategies that will motivate its employees avoid complacency and embark on  blueprint competitive products. Failure to do so will make the company to lose these potential clients to rivals because these opportunities are for all companies in this industry (Grant, 2013). The main threat, as highlighted in the case study, is the rivalry that exists in the industry. This has to be overcome by application of the strategies that were     preliminary discussed in Porters generic strategy model. This will make the company a formidable competitor in the industry. Conclusion and Recommendations From the analysis above by the use of Porters generic strategies and SWOT analysis it has been identified that whilst the company may have some weaknesses, it also possesses several capabilities if well utilised, will  confirm its brand position in the denim apparel industry. Several recommendation can however be made for Levi Strauss.  superstar of these would be that the company should focus on the frequently changing needs of consumers in the denim market and ensure that its operations and designs are flexible enough to match with these changing trends. Taking advantage of technological milestones in the fashion industry also recommended. This will ensure the production of unique yet trendy designs. From the Ansoff matrix below, the strategic directions that a company can use to position itself in the market are presented (Ta   ylor, 2012).Two of the four strategic directions suggested by this model have already been adopted by Levi Company, that is, selling  brisk products to existing markets and extending existing products in new markets. It can however recommended that the company should adopt one of the two remaining factors of this model, which is the diversification through creation of more designs of products that suit a wider demographic scope of customers. This will lead to larger consumer base hence higher(prenominal) revenue.ReferencesCunningham, J., & Harney, B?. (2012)  outline and Strategists. Oxford Oxford University Press.Grant, R. M. (2013) Contemporary Strategy Analysis.  upstart Jersey Wiley.Johnson, G., Whittington, R., Angwin, D., Regnr, P., & Scholes, K. (2014). Exploring Strategy text Only. UK Pearson Education, Limited.Ommani, A. R. (2011) Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT) analysis for farming system businesses  guidance Case of wheat farmers of Shadervan Distr   ict, Shoushtar Township, Iran. African  daybook of Business  guidance. 5(22). p.9448-9454.Porter, M. (2008)  rivalrous Strategy Techniques for Analysing Industries and Competitors. New York Simon and Schuster.Tanwar, R. (2013) Porters Generic Competitive Strategies. Journal of Business and Management. 15(1). p.11-17.Taylor, E. C. (2012) Competitive  utility Planning Using Ansoffs  hyaloplasm with Abells Model to Inform the strategic Management Process. Academy of Strategic Management 10(1). p.21-25.Zott, C., Amit, R., & Massa, L. (2011) The business model recent developments and future research. Journal of management 37(4). p.1019-1042.  
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.